This ‘state of the art’ essay provides a comprehensive discussion of the Law and Finance School (LFS) literature. We show that the first two decades of the LFS have focused on em-pirically investigating the question ‘does law matter?’ Yet, despite the centrality of law to the LFS, it is based on an incoherent theory of law, which leads to shortcomings in the conceptu-alisation and empirical testing of its hypotheses. We also observe that, rather than addressing this deficiency, the LFS has moved its focus to the contentious concept of ‘legal origin.’ We argue that the LFS needs to take law more seriously by returning to its initial focus on the substance of legal rules and by addressing the theoretical question ‘how does law matter?’ We propose venues for future research to develop a solid theoretical framework that would put the empirical investigation of law’s impact on economic outcomes on a more solid footing.
Funding
This research was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) under project number RES-061-25-0518 (Law & Agency project).
History
School
Loughborough University London
Published in
Socio-Economic Review
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
377-406
Citation
SCHNYDER, G., SIEMS, M. and AGUILERA, R.V., 2021. Twenty years of ‘Law and Finance’: Time to take law seriously. Socio-Economic Review, 19 (1), pp.377-406.
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Socio-Economic Review following peer review. The version of record SCHNYDER, G., SIEMS, M. and AGUILERA, R.V., 2021. Twenty years of ‘Law and Finance’: Time to take law seriously. Socio-Economic Review, 19 (1), pp.377-406 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy041.