Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) has the potential to offer increased value
and usability benefits to end-users over and above that of Professional Geographic Information (PGI).
Using a multi-methods approach consisting of participatory observation, focus groups and diary
studies, the differences between VGI and PGI are investigated in relation to the characteristics which
are the most, or least relevant to an end-user community. The key finding was that the discussion
amongst designers should not be whether to choose VGI or PGI as the information data set, but to
consider which combination of VGI and PGI relating to different geographic features and task
characteristics will best fit the user requirements. VGI is likely to be most relevant to the user when a
geographic features is dynamic rather than static in nature These findings have implications for how
different forms of information may be most effectively utilised within different usage situations.
Above all, a case is presented for the implementation of User Centred Design principals when
integrating VGI and PGI together in a single mashup based product to maximise benefit to the end
user.
History
School
Design
Citation
PARKER, C.J., MAY, A. and MITCHELL, V., 2012. Understanding design with VGI using an information relevance framework. Transactions in GIS, 16 (4), pp.545-560.