Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus
journal contributionposted on 2016-02-11, 12:30 authored by Katrien Wijndaele, Kate Westgate, Samantha K. Stephens, Steven N. Blair, Fiona C. Bull, Sebastien F.M. Chastin, David W. Dunstan, Ulf Ekelund, Dale EsligerDale Esliger, Patty S. Freedson, Malcolm H. Granat, Charles E. Matthews, Neville Owen, Alex V. Rowlands, Lauren SherarLauren Sherar, Mark S. Tremblay, Richard P. Troiano, Soren Brage, Genevieve N. Healy
Purpose: This study aimed to describe the scope of accelerometry data collected internationally in adults and to obtain a consensus from measurement experts regarding the optimal strategies to harmonize international accelerometry data. Methods: In March 2014, a comprehensive review was undertaken to identify studies that collected accelerometry data in adults (sample size, n >= 400). In addition, 20 physical activity experts were invited to participate in a two-phase Delphi process to obtain consensus on the following: unique research opportunities available with such data, additional data required to address these opportunities, strategies for enabling comparisons between studies/countries, requirements for implementing/progressing such strategies, and value of a global repository of accelerometry data. Results: The review identified accelerometry data from more than 275,000 adults from 76 studies across 36 countries. Consensus was achieved after two rounds of the Delphi process; 18 experts participated in one or both rounds. The key opportunities highlighted were the ability for cross-country/cross-population comparisons and the analytic options available with the larger heterogeneity and greater statistical power. Basic sociodemographic and anthropometric data were considered a prerequisite for this. Disclosure of monitor specifications and protocols for data collection and processing were deemed essential to enable comparison and data harmonization. There was strong consensus that standardization of data collection, processing, and analytical procedures was needed. To implement these strategies, communication and consensus among researchers, development of an online infrastructure, and methodological comparison work were required. There was consensus that a global accelerometry data repository would be beneficial and worthwhile. Conclusions: This foundational resource can lead to implementation of key priority areas and identification of future directions in physical activity epidemiology, population monitoring, and burden of disease estimates.
This work and authors involved in this work were supported by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (grants MC_UU_12015/3 and MRC Centenary Award to K. Wi., S. B.), the British Heart Foundation (grant FS/12/58/29709 to K. Wi.), the Australian Heart Foundation (grant PH 12B 7054 to G. N. H.), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (fellowship to N. O., program grant to N. O., and National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence Grant in the Translational Science of Sedentary Behaviour APP1041056 to G. N. H., N. O., and D. D.), an Australian postgraduate award (to S. S.), the Coca-Cola Company, Body Media, US National Institutes of Health and Technogym (to S. B.), MRC, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Engineering, and Physical Sciences Research Council, Greater Manchester Academic Health Science Network (to M. G.), and Australian Research Council (Future Fellowship, FT100100918, to D. D.).
- Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published inMEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Pages2129 - 2139 (11)
CitationWIJNDAELE, K. ... et al., 2015. Utilization and harmonization of adult accelerometry data: review and expert consensus. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 47 (10), pp. 2129 - 2139.
PublisherAmerican College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
- VoR (Version of Record)
Publisher statementThis work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/
NotesThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.