When journalists run for office: the effects of journalist-candidates on citizens’ populist attitudes and voting intentions
This study analyzes how citizens respond to information about high-profile journalists who run for office for major political parties. An experiment embedded in the Italian National Election Studies 2018 pre-election survey (N=1,533) tested whether exposure to information about journalistcandidates affects citizens’ levels of populist attitudes and voting intentions. Information on journalist-candidates led to statistically significant increases in populist attitudes, particularly when participants were told that journalists were running for all the main parties. By contrast, participants who were informed about journalist-candidates did not increase their probability to vote for the parties that featured journalist-candidates in their lists. These findings suggest that political parties do not stand to gain substantial electoral benefits when they recruit journalist-candidates, but this practice increases citizens’ perceptions that both journalism and politics do not serve their interests. Citizens remain attached to the idea that journalists should retain some distance from politics rather than aim to become politicians themselves.
History
School
- Social Sciences and Humanities
Department
- Communication and Media
Published in
International Journal of CommunicationVolume
16Pages
3422 - 3442Publisher
University of Southern CaliforniaVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by University of Southern California under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Acceptance date
2022-02-28Publication date
2022-06-30Copyright date
2022ISSN
1932-8036Publisher version
Language
- en