greiffenhagen-sharrock-limits_of_experience.pdf (135.63 kB)
Where do the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dualism of objectivity and subjectivity
journal contributionposted on 2013-10-03, 13:25 authored by Christian Greiffenhagen, Wes Sharrock
The relationship between 'subjective' and 'objective' features of social reality (and between 'subjectivist' and 'objectivist' sociological approaches) remains problematic within social thought. Phenomenology is often taken as a paradigmatic example of subjectivist sociology, since it supposedly places exclusive emphasis on actors' 'subjective' interpretations, thereby neglecting 'objective' social structures. In this article, we question whether phenomenology is usefully understood as falling on either side of the standard divides, arguing that phenomenology's conception of 'subjective' experience of social reality includes many features taken to be 'objective' elements of it. We illustrate our argument by a critical examination of Jean Lave's attempt to differentiate social practice theory from phenomenology. We show that many theoretical positions that want to overcome the subjective-objective dualism retain an objectivist conception of the 'subjective' features of social reality. © 2008 SAGE Publications.
- Social Sciences
- Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
CitationGREIFFENHAGEN, C. and SHARROCK, W., 2008. Where do the limits of experience lie? Abandoning the dualism of objectivity and subjectivity. History of the Human Sciences, 21 (3), pp. 70 - 93.
Publisher© SAGE Publications
- AM (Accepted Manuscript)
NotesThis article was published in the journal, History of the Human Sciences [© SAGE Publications] and the definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695108093954