Dual screening during televised election debates is a new domain in which political elites and journalists seek to influence audience attitudes and behavior. But to what extent do non-elite dual screeners seek to influence others, particularly their social media followers, social media users in general, and even politicians and journalists? And how does this behavior affect short- and longer-term engagement with election campaigns? Using unique, event-based, panel survey data from the main 2015 UK general election debate (Wave 1 = 2,351; Wave 2 = 1,168) we reveal the conditions under which people experience agency, empowerment, and engagement now that social media have reconfigured broadcast political television.
History
School
Social Sciences
Department
Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies
Published in
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
220 - 239
Citation
CHADWICK, A., O'LOUGHLIN, B. and VACCARI, C., 2017. Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for democratic engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), pp. 220-239.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Acceptance date
2017-03-23
Publication date
2017-05-26
Notes
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media on 26 May 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08838151.2017.1309415.