posted on 2017-08-16, 10:50authored byKubra Arslan, Yadava Jeve, Angie Doshani
Purpose: Work-related musculoskeletal injuries (WRMSI) have been well known amongst obstetrics and gynaecology (O & G) practitioners, but limited data have been reported. Our aim is to determine the prevalence, severity and characteristics of WRMSI amongst O & G trainees. Methods: A musculoskeletal ergonomic survey was conducted amongst the O & G trainees in the East-Midlands region of United Kingdom (UK). The survey comprised of demographic details, year of training, previous manual handling training, any work-related orthopaedic injury, the type of injury, any treatment received in addition to any sick leave incurred after the injury were also documented. Results: The response rate for the survey was 76% (59/78). The majority (22%) were senior specialist trainee, seventh year (ST7) and between 30 and 34 age groups. Approximately 90% of the trainees reported to have experienced pain in the last year. The most common site was the back, which was followed by the shoulders and the upper limbs. 63% of trainees reported injuries that were attributed to WRMSI. One in ten of the trainees needed time off work due to injury. A total of 20 days were lost in the last 12 months as a result of pain or discomfort attributed to obstetric work. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the prevalence of work-related injuries and its detrimental effects. Such injuries are underreported on incident reporting system. Ergonomics and WRMSI prevention in obstetrics and gynaecology is an area seldom discussed. Obstetric training sessions should incorporate ergonomic interventions. Further research is required to establish relevant aetiological factors related to WRMSI in this specialty.
History
School
Design
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Pages
1 - 6
Citation
OKUYUCU, K., JEVE, Y. and DOSHANI, A., 2017. Work-related musculoskeletal injuries amongst obstetrics and gynaecology trainees in East Midland region of the UK. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 296 (3), pp 489–494.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/
Acceptance date
2017-06-26
Publication date
2017
Notes
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.