posted on 2016-12-15, 16:24authored byAmanda E. Young, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Cecile R.L. Boot, Chetwyn Chan, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras, Steven J. Linton, Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention, Fehmidah MunirFehmidah Munir
Introduction Outcome assessment is a central issue in work disability prevention research. The goal of this paper was to (1) ascertain the most salient workplace outcomes; (2) evaluate the congruence between business and science perspectives; (3) illustrate new perspectives on assessing longitudinal outcomes; and (4) provide recommendations for advancing outcome evaluation in this area of research. Methods The authors participated in a year-long collaboration that culminated in a sponsored 3-day conference, “Improving Research of Employer Practices to Prevent Disability”, held October 14–16, 2015, in Hopkinton, MA, USA. The collaboration included a topical review of the literature, group conference calls to identify key areas and challenges, drafting of initial documents, review of industry publications, and a conference presentation that included feedback from peer researchers and a question/answer session with a special panel of knowledge experts with direct employer experience. Results Numerous workplace work-disability prevention outcome measures were identified. Analysis indicated that their applicability varied depending on the type of work disability the worker was experiencing. For those who were working, but with health-related work limitations (Type 1), predominant outcomes were measures of productivity, presenteeism, and work-related limitations. For those who were off work due to a health condition (Type 2), predominant outcomes were measures of time off work, supervisor/employee interactions, and return-to-work (RTW) preparation. For those who had returned to work (Type 3), predominant outcomes were measures of presenteeism, time until RTW, percentage of work resumption, employment characteristics, stigma, work engagement, co-worker interactions, and sustained or durable RTW. For those who had withdrawn from the labor force (Type 4), predominant outcomes were cost and vocational status. Discussion Currently available measures provide a good basis to use more consistent outcomes in disability prevention in the future. The research area would also benefit from more involvement of employers as stakeholders, and multilevel conceptualizations of disability outcomes.
History
School
Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
434 - 447
Citation
YOUNG, A.E. ... et al., 2016. Workplace outcomes in work-disability prevention research: a review with recommendations for future research. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 26 (4), pp. 434 - 447.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/
Acceptance date
2016-07-31
Publication date
2016
Notes
Hopkinton Conference Working Group on
Workplace Disability Prevention includes Benjamin C. Amick III,
Johannes R. Anema, Elyssa Besen, Peter Blanck, Ce´cile R.L. Boot,
Ute Bu¨ltmann, Chetwyn C.H. Chan, George L. Delclos, Kerstin
Ekberg, Mark G. Ehrhart, Jean-Baptiste Fassier, Michael Feuerstein,
David Gimeno, Vicki L. Kristman, Steven J. Linton, Chris J. Main,
Fehmidah Munir, Michael K. Nicholas, Glenn Pransky, William S.
Shaw, Michael J. Sullivan, Lois E. Tetrick, Torill H. Tveito, Eira
Viikari-Juntura, Kelly Williams-Whitt, and Amanda E. Young.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creative
commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution,
and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate
credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.