Mediatization response.pdf (26.89 kB)
Download file

'Mediatization and' or 'Mediatization of'? A response to Hepp et al.

Download (26.89 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 06.07.2015, 13:56 by David DeaconDavid Deacon, James StanyerJames Stanyer
We welcome Hepp et al.’s (2015) response to our recent critique of the concept of ‘Mediatization’ (Deacon and Stanyer, 2014), which they also use to showcase new literature on this topic. Their article demonstrates why further robust debate on this matter is needed. For when internationally renowned academics start to declare ‘paradigmatic shifts’, then a much wider community of scholars need to consider whether or not the earth is moving for them (see Hepp et al., 2015: 314–315, 321).

History

School

  • Social Sciences

Department

  • Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies

Published in

MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY

Volume

37

Issue

4

Pages

655 - 657 (3)

Citation

DEACON, D. and STANYER, J., 2015. 'Mediatization and' or 'Mediatization of'? A response to Hepp et al. Media, Culture and Society, 37 (4), pp. 655 - 657.

Publisher

SAGE Publications Ltd / © The Author(s)

Version

SMUR (Submitted Manuscript Under Review)

Publisher statement

This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Publication date

2015

Notes

This item was submitted for publication in the journal, Media, Culture and Society [SAGE Publications Ltd / © The Author(s)]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0163443715580761.

ISSN

0163-4437

Language

en