Loughborough University
Browse

In silico evaluation of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel stent in a patient-specific coronary artery

Download (11.51 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-11-02, 17:13 authored by Ran He, Enzoh Langi, Rebecca Garrard, Moataz M Attallah, Vadim SilberschmidtVadim Silberschmidt, Felix Vogt, Liguo Zhao

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging method for the fabrication of stents, which is cost-saving and capable of producing personalised stent designs. However, poor surface finish and dimension discrepancy in the manufactured stents can significantly affect not only their own mechanical behaviour but also mechanical response of arteries. This study investigates the effects of surface irregularities and dimension discrepancy of a 316L stainless steel stent, manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), on its biomechanical performance, in comparison with the original design and a commercial stent. In silico simulations of stent deployment in a patient-specific coronary artery, based on intravital optical coherency tomography imaging, are conducted to assess the stent deformation as well as arterial stress and damage. Severe plastic strain concentrations (with a maximum value of 1.93) occur in the LPBF stent after deployment due to surface irregularities, suggesting a high risk of stent fracture. The LPBF stent is harder to expand due to its thicker struts and closed-cell design (diameter of 4.14 mm at the peak inflating pressure during deployment, compared to 4.58 mm and 4.65 mm for the designed and MULTI-LINK RX ULTRA stents, respectively). Also, the LPBF stent induces a higher level of stress concentration (with a maximum value of 23.04 MPa) to the arterial layers, suggesting a higher risk of tissue damage and in-stent restenosis. This study demonstrates a clear need for further development of the AM process for manufacturing medical implants, especially the surface finish and dimension accuracy.

Funding

Smart Peripheral Stents for the Lower Extremity - Design, Manufacturing and Evaluation

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Find out more...

History

School

  • Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering

Published in

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volume

109

Publisher

Elsevier

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Rights holder

© The Authors

Publisher statement

This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Elsevier under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Acceptance date

2022-10-13

Publication date

2022-10-17

Copyright date

2022

ISSN

1350-4533

Language

  • en

Depositor

Dr Ran He. Deposit date: 13 October 2022

Article number

103909

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC