In silico evaluation of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel stent in a patient-specific coronary artery
Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging method for the fabrication of stents, which is cost-saving and capable of producing personalised stent designs. However, poor surface finish and dimension discrepancy in the manufactured stents can significantly affect not only their own mechanical behaviour but also mechanical response of arteries. This study investigates the effects of surface irregularities and dimension discrepancy of a 316L stainless steel stent, manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), on its biomechanical performance, in comparison with the original design and a commercial stent. In silico simulations of stent deployment in a patient-specific coronary artery, based on intravital optical coherency tomography imaging, are conducted to assess the stent deformation as well as arterial stress and damage. Severe plastic strain concentrations (with a maximum value of 1.93) occur in the LPBF stent after deployment due to surface irregularities, suggesting a high risk of stent fracture. The LPBF stent is harder to expand due to its thicker struts and closed-cell design (diameter of 4.14 mm at the peak inflating pressure during deployment, compared to 4.58 mm and 4.65 mm for the designed and MULTI-LINK RX ULTRA stents, respectively). Also, the LPBF stent induces a higher level of stress concentration (with a maximum value of 23.04 MPa) to the arterial layers, suggesting a higher risk of tissue damage and in-stent restenosis. This study demonstrates a clear need for further development of the AM process for manufacturing medical implants, especially the surface finish and dimension accuracy.
Funding
Smart Peripheral Stents for the Lower Extremity - Design, Manufacturing and Evaluation
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Find out more...History
School
- Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering
Published in
Medical Engineering and PhysicsVolume
109Publisher
ElsevierVersion
- VoR (Version of Record)
Rights holder
© The AuthorsPublisher statement
This is an Open Access Article. It is published by Elsevier under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY). Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Acceptance date
2022-10-13Publication date
2022-10-17Copyright date
2022ISSN
1350-4533Publisher version
Language
- en