posted on 2008-04-28, 08:17authored byRachel Elliman, Lucy Rackliff, Steven ReedSteven Reed, Andrew MorrisAndrew Morris, Heikki Jahi, Lindsay Cant, Gilles Vallet, Michael Jaensch, Dietmar Otte, Gabriele Giustiniani, D. Shingo Usami, Helen Fagerlind, Kalle Parkkari
Unlike the rail, civil aviation and maritime transport modes, there is currently
no standard process for investigating road accidents within Europe. There is,
therefore, a wide range of road accident investigation procedures and
protocols in place across Europe. However, as countries work towards
meeting both their own road safety targets and those set by the European
Commission, it may be that existing investigation practices are no longer
suited to facilitating the decision making processes of road safety policymakers
or practitioners.
SafetyNet is a European Commission supported project, which is building a
European Road Safety Observatory to facilitate the formulation of road safety
policy in the European Union. Work package 4 of SafetyNet is developing
recommendations for a Transparent and Independent pan-European
approach to road accident investigation.
These recommendations propose the establishment of an independent body
for undertaking transparent and independent accident investigations where
necessary, or the implementation of these investigations in existing national
safety orientated accident investigation activities, in each of the EU Member
States. This body would gather and manage accident investigation data and
use this data to further progress road safety within the EU.
To define the framework in which this body might operate, ‘Best practice’ from
existing investigative organisations across Europe was examined in order to
produce a set of draft recommendations which focused on four categories of
issues:
1. Institutional, referring to the structure and functioning of the body
responsible for road safety investigations;
2. Operational, detailing how the body carries out investigations;
3. Data, addressing issues surrounding the storage, retrieval and
analysis of data generated by investigations; and
4. Development of Countermeasures, dealing with how investigation
conclusions should be presented, used and disseminated.
A consultation exercise was then undertaken in order to gather the expert
opinion of European road safety stakeholders and to further develop the
recommended framework. This highlighted a number of key questions about
the Draft Recommendations including:
• Is the proposed level of transparency and independence appropriate
for road accident investigations?
• Is one type of investigative activity appropriate for all types of accidents
ranging from the most severe or ‘major’ accidents to the large number
of more minor accidents that occur everyday?
The major conclusion was that a ‘one size fits all’ approach is not appropriate
for the investigation of road accidents and therefore multiple sets of
recommendations are required. This paper discusses how the four categories
of recommendations combine to form a framework where the data gathered
during road accident investigations can be used to develop road accident
countermeasures which will assist in casualty reduction throughout Europe.
History
School
Design
Citation
ELLIMAN, R.K. ... et al, 2007. Proposing a framework for pan European transparent and independent road accident investigation. European Transport Conference (ETC) 2007, Leeuwenhorst Conference Centre, The Netherlands, 17-19 October