LuenbergerProductivity.pdf (317.23 kB)

A productivity analysis of Eastern European banking taking into account risk decomposition and environmental variables

Download (317.23 kB)
posted on 15.03.2010, 12:21 by Karligash Glass, Richard Simper
This paper develops a new Luenberger productivity which is applied to a technology where the desirable and undesirable outputs are jointly produced and are possibly negative. The components of this Luenberger productivity index - the efficiency change and the components of the technological shift - are then decomposed into factors determined by the technology, adjusted for ‘risk and environment’, ‘risk management’ and ‘environmental effects’. The method is applied to Central and Eastern European banks operating during 1998–2003 utilising three alternative input/output methodologies (intermediation, production and profit/revenue). Additionally, the comparative analysis of the sensitivity of the productivity indices in the choice of the methodologies is undertaken using statistical and kernel density tests. It is found that the main driver of productivity change in Central and Eastern European banks is technological improvement, which, in the beginning of the analysed period, hinged on the banks’ ability to capitalise on advanced technology and successfully take into account risk and environmental factors. Whereas, in the later sampled periods, we show that one of the most important factors of technological improvement/decline is risk management. Finally, the tests employed confirm previous findings, such as Pasiouras (2008) in this journal, that different input/output methodologies produce statistically different productivity results. Indeed, we also find that external factors, such as a risk in the economy and banking production, and a ‘corruption perception’ affect the productivity of banks.



  • Business and Economics


  • Economics


© Loughborough University


VoR (Version of Record)

Publication date



This is a working paper. It is also available at:



Book series

Loughborough University. Department of Economics. Discussion Paper Series;WP 2010 - 02




Loughborough Publications