Preprints are manuscripts made publicly available before they have been submitted for formal peer review and publication. They might contain new research findings or data. Preprints can be a draft or final version of an author's research but must not have been accepted for publication at the time of submission.
posted on 30.05.2006by Kevin Morrell, John Loan-Clarke, Adrian Wilkinson
This paper brings together three different accounts of the role of replication in management studies: replication as ‘scientific project’, replication as ‘socio-cultural artefact’; replication as ‘aesthetic practice’. Each of these is developed from within separate reference frames: epistemology, the sociology of science, and the philosophy of art. This offers new scope to revisit a fundamental question in management studies, namely: why is there a gap between the espoused value placed upon replication, and the actual paucity of replication studies? Each reference frame offers different insights into the nature of replication. The paper argues that by integrating all three, and by understanding the potential contribution of the philosophy of art, a more realistic account of theory development is possible; one that explains why successive calls to researchers to replicate fall on deaf ears. Despite the empirical evidence to suggest replication studies are undervalued, and the problems posed by postmodernist challenges to science, we reiterate the importance of replication.
MORRELL, LOAN-CLARKE and WILKINSON, 2004. Go forth and replicate: a revisionist account of the value of replication in management studies. Occasional Paper, 2004:3, Loughborough: Business School, Loughborough University
THIS PAPER IS CIRCULATED FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES AND ITS CONTENTS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AND CONFIDENTIAL. NO REFERENCE TO MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN MAY BE MADE WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE AUTHORS.