The potential for further changes to the personal taxation regime to encourage modal shift. Final report for Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, June
reportposted on 2009-02-09, 12:20 authored by Stephen Potter, Marcus P. Enoch, Tom Rye, Colin Black
This project was commissioned by the DETR to fulfil a commitment made in the 1998 white paper on integrated transport, A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone. This was to carry out research on the influence of the existing tax system with a view to seeing whether changes could be effective in promoting the use of more environmentally friendly forms of transport. The report includes a review of the UK tax treatment of commuting benefits, which is compared to those of other countries with a different tax regime. Key points include: • A general tax concession for all commuting trips creates negative transport and environmental impacts; it tends to stimulate car commuting and trip lengthening and is costly to the state concerned. A capped commuting concession would reduce these problems. • In countries with a similar tax treatment of commuting as exists in the UK, targeted tax concessions upon employer-provided Travel Plan benefits have featured. This add private sector resources to the tax concession and enhances the modal shift effect. The most effective Travel Plan measures involve direct financial incentives and disincentives. In general the car use reduction effects of different Travel Plans is: • Zero for information-only Travel Plans • 5% for schemes consisting mainly of carpooling; • 8 - 10% for those incorporating financial incentives to use alternative modes, and • 15%+ for those that included financial disincentives to car use. In the UK, many of the most effective measures are affected by the personal tax system. A survey of employers developing Travel Plans was conducted, which concluded that: • Although information and guidance may appear an appropriate response where there is a lack of understanding of the tax liability of Travel Plan measures, the use of such an approach would be ineffective without being spearheaded by actual tax reform. • The issue of tax clashes with a company’s ‘tax-efficient’ culture is of most significance when organisations are trying to develop their Travel Plans from their initial, fairly ineffective stages, to be more effective by the use of financial incentives and disincentives. • There is evidence that tax does reduce the effectiveness of Travel Plan measures and that some modest and targeted reform measures could both eliminate most of the negative tax impacts and ease the development of Travel Plans within a company’s dominant culture ...
- Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering