posted on 2011-01-17, 12:01authored byAlistair Cheyne
This research examines the structure of safety climate in the manufacturing sector. It
does so by examining and comparing attitudes to, and perceptions of, safety issues in
two manufacturing organisations and one organisation involved in the supply of
construction materials. The concept of safety climate, and the associated concept of
safety culture, have been the subject of much research and theory building in recent
years and this thesis builds on previous work. The research framework used here
employed a mainly quantitative methodology in order to investigate the architecture of
safety climate using structural modelling. Statistical modelling has been applied in other
safety studies, often involving safety climate as one variable in a global description of
safety systems. However it has rarely been used to model and describe the structure of
safety climate as an indicator of safety culture, as in this research.
The structure of safety climate described in this research is characterised by the
interaction of organisational, group interaction, work environment and individual
variables, which provide indicators of influences on individual levels of safety activity.
Structural models of the data from all three participating organisations fitted the broad
pattern of organisational variables influencing group and work environment variables,
which, in turn influence individual variables. A more detailed comparison of
organisational structures, however, highlighted slight differences between the two
manufacturing organisations and more pronounced differences between these and the
construction material supply organisation, suggesting that most elements in the structure
of attitudes to safety described here are industry specific. These results are explained in
terms of working environments. Differences in structure, consistent with job roles, were
also apparent between occupational levels.
The research, in line with previous work in the field, has highlighted the importance of
management commitment to, and actions for, safety, as well as the role of individual
responsibility in the promotion of safety activity. The work reported here has
emphasised their importance in developing and maintaining an organisational culture for
safety.