posted on 2011-02-01, 16:20authored byMichael J. Green
This thesis explores the process of elite sport policy change in three sports (swimming, athletics and sailing/yachting) in Canada and the United Kingdom (UK). The nature of
policy change is a complex and multi-faceted process and a primary aim of the study is
to identify and analyse key sources of policy change in four elements of elite sport
programming: i) the development of elite level facilities; ii) the emergence of 'full-time'
swimmers, athletes and sailors; iii) the adoption of a more professional and scientific
approach to coaching, sports science and sports medicine; and iv) competition
opportunities and structures at the elite level. The study focuses on the meso-level of
analysis, which centres on the structures and patterns of relationships in respect of
three Canadian national sporting organisations (NSOs) and three UK national governing
bodies of sport (NGBs) - representing the three sports cited above. The macro-level of
analysis is also considered, where the primary concern is to analyse relations of power
between governmenta nd quasi-governmentasl porting agenciesa nd the respective
NSOs/NGBs.
A case study approach is adopted, focusing on the six NSOs/NGBs, wherein a qualitative
methodology is utilised in order to elicit data in respect of policy change in the four key
elements of elite sport programming set out above. Within the case study approach, the
advocacy coalition framework has proved useful in drawing attention to the notion of
changing values and belief systems as a key source of policy change, as well as
highlighting the need to take into account factors external to the policy subsystem
under investigation. In Canada, it is evident that the preoccupation with high
performance sport over the past 30 years, at federal government level, has perceptibly
altered over the past two to three years. In contrast, in the UK, from the mid-1990s
onwards, there has been a noticeable shift towards supporting elite sport objectives
from both Conservative and Labour administrations. The study concludes that it is only
by exploring specific sports through a comparative-analytic framework that a better
understanding of policy change, within the complex and multi-layered sport policy
process, might be achieved.