The aim was to formulate ergonomics criteria to assist in the
design and evaluation of various commonly used packages so that they
are well adapted to the needs, capabilities and limitations of
consumers. The consumers used in the study included male and female
able-bodied subjects, some of whom were elderly; and the disabled, who
suffered from arthritis, Parkinson's disease, cerebral palsy, multiple
sclerosis, or one-handed function (hemiplegics or amputees).
The design criteria took the form of normative data. These were
derived, by experiment, with subjects handling specially designed
apparatus which closely simulated the characteristics of real packages.
The norms were the torques and forces that the weak, average and strong
subjects could exert on a range of packages. The norms were related to
the breaking torques and breaking forces of packages found in the
market place. It was shown that many of these packages require opening
torques and forces which are well beyond the capabilities of the weaker
sections of the sample.
New methods for representing the torques which people can exert
were derived, involving the calculation of ratios of centiles between
and within groups for comfortable and maximum exertions of torque. It
is suggested that this method, which has considerable promise, be
further validated in future studies involving not only the description
of forces and torques, but also that of the reaches, carrying and
lifting capacity, the articulation, pushing and pulling capacity, and
physical endurance of human subjects. The promise lies in the
short-hand derivation of the capabilities of weaker segments of the
population, who are difficult to obtain in large numbers, from studies
involving small samples from the fit and able population.