posted on 2006-06-14, 12:08authored byGemma L. Witcomb
In humans, what, when, and how much is eaten is the result of a complex interplay
between physiological and psychological dietary controls. The need to identify how these
different influences interact is integral to understanding how eating behaviour is regulated
in a range of different contexts. In particular, one phenomenon that remains poorly
understood is why eating while distracted is associated with increased food intake. The aim
of this thesis is to attempt to identify the nature of the potential process that underlies this
phenomenon. In Part I, the relationship between dietary strategy, allocation of attention,
and amount eaten is explored in three experiments. The results confirm that intake can be
predicted by how attention is directed during a meal. Furthermore, contrary to previous
accounts that view overeating as a passive behaviour, this research suggests that
individuals may choose to direct their attention strategically in order to control their intake.
In Part II, four experiments investigate the possibility that the mechanism underlying the
relationship between attention and intake is related to a process akin to ‘sensory-specific
satiety’. This term describes the hedonic shift in the sensory properties of a food that occur
as it is eaten and which is believed to be important in meal termination. The results suggest
that distraction is associated with an attenuation of the rate at which ‘desire to eat’ (both
generally and specifically for the food being eaten) declines. Furthermore, although
declining pleasantness is reported to remain influential in determining eating cessation
when distracted, this response is somewhat inhibited, occurring after a greater amount of
food has been consumed. Based on this, the conclusion drawn is that the deficit underlying
overeating is one of attention, and that this may lead to overeating by undermining the rate
at which satiety develops.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2005
Notes
A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy
of Loughborough University. Title page author Gemma Mitchell.