posted on 2012-05-16, 08:35authored byLouise Croft
The increased participation in elite wheelchair sport has provided the need to
investigate the physiological requirements of wheelchair sporting competition and daily
wheelchair propulsion. However, from a nutritional perspective, guidelines that have been
established from the able-bodied population tend to be used by the practitioners working in
disability sport and it is not known whether this information is directly transferable to the
wheelchair athlete. Wheelchair sport is complex and athletes differ with respect to their
sports classification based on factors relating to disability and functional capacity.
Therefore, if nutritional guidance is required to optimise performance then information
regarding energy expenditure (EE) in the wheelchair sports population becomes important
for specific feedback. The aim of this thesis was to investigate EE in wheelchair athletes.
The results from Chapter 3 found resting energy expenditure (REE) in tetraplegic
athletes to be lower than that calculated using predictive equations derived from an ablebodied
cohort. However, paraplegic athletes showed comparable values to those which
were predicted, suggesting these equations may be of use in paraplegic athletes. Chapter 4
extended this work and found similarities in the REE of the two aforementioned cohorts.
This could have been due to the similarities that were found in their total-body fat free
mass (FFM). The results from Chapter 5 showed EE reduced after both a short 36 minute
exposure of wheelchair propulsion and after 3 weeks of wheelchair propulsion practice in
novice wheelchair users. Temporal parameters improved after the practice period,
suggesting there is an association between EE and propulsion technique. Chapter 6
extended these findings with results confirming that experienced wheelchair users
expended significantly less energy during wheelchair propulsion than novice individuals
who had up to 3 weeks practice. It is clear that EE of daily wheelchair ambulation should
not be a generic value and different levels of experience must be considered so that the
nutritional needs can be tailored accordingly.
Chapters 7 and 8 examined the physiological demands of elite competitive
wheelchair basketball players in relation to the International Wheelchair Basketball
Federation (IWBF) classification categories and identified differences in the physiological
demands and physiological fitness of wheelchair basketball and tennis players. These
results found that IWBF Class 3 – 4.5 (high point) players expended more energy per hour
during competition than those with a lower classification (IWBF Class 1 – 2.5). However,
when actual playing time was considered the low classification group showed a similar EE
to the higher classification group. Furthermore, wheelchair basketball players had a higher
EE per hour than wheelchair tennis players during elite competition. However, the
wheelchair tennis players spent a significantly longer duration on court resulting in similar
EE during a typical competition within each sport. This suggests nutritional advice should
be tailored both to the duration of competitive play (where EE may be similar between
sports (basketball vs. tennis)); and to training (where athletes with a higher functional
capacity may have higher EE). This thesis revealed several important physiological
considerations to appreciate when investigating the EE of wheelchair sportsmen and
women. Findings would suggest that type of disability, wheelchair propulsion experience
and sport classification are all important considerations for the accurate assessment of EE
in this cohort of athletes.