The National Parks of the United Kingdom are characterised by their beautiful countryside
and spectacular rural landscapes. They are also significant leisure based trip attracting
locations, the dominant transport mode being the private car which typically accounts for
90% of all journeys made to these destinations. Excessive car use in National Parks is
problematic since traffic congestion, environmental degradation, vehicle noise and parking
problems serve to undermine the natural and recreational values which they are intended
to promote.
As recognition of the negative impacts of car use in National Parks has grown, so have calls
for innovation and experimentation in approaches to traffic management and transport
policy in these locations. Despite this, policy change has been slow. Sustainable and
effective solutions to transport problems in UK National Parks appear no nearer to being
found now than they were sixty five years ago.
Accordingly, this thesis seeks to investigate the process of policy change with respect to
leisure transport in UK National Parks. The study adopts the Multiple Streams framework
(Kingdon, 1984) as the mechanism by which to explore policy change in the sector, and a
case study method is chosen as the overarching research approach. Within the case study
design, a three stage research method is undertaken, consisting of a) documentary analysis
combined with semi-structured interviews with Transport Officers at UK National Park
Authorities, b) two sub case studies at the local level in the New Forest and Yorkshire Dales
National Parks, and c) semi-structured interviews with National Park transport planning
experts at the national level.
The Multiple Streams framework is shown to accurately identify important processes and
mechanisms which can be seen to account for policy stability (and therefore inhibit change)
within the National Park transport planning sector. As such, the thesis concludes that at the
present time there is no significant window for policy change with respect to leisure
transport in UK National Parks. A number of barriers exist which make this so. First are
perceptions of public and political apathy towards transport problems in the National Parks,
and a lack of quantifiable data by which to ‗frame‘ these issues. Second are competing
agendas of key delivery agencies in the policy sector, where conflict between economic and
environment objectives limit the consideration of certain transport planning instruments for
use. Third are issues surrounding the technical feasibility (in terms of implementation) and
public acceptability of a range of transport planning instruments, and fourth is a lack of
advocacy for policy change amongst the general public and politicians at the local and
national level. In light of the research findings, recommendations and advice to policy
makers and practitioners seeking change within the sector are offered.