posted on 2012-10-19, 11:35authored byAndrew J. Irwin
A key stage in the design-cycle of a military aircraft is the assessment of its vulnerability to
hostile threat mechanisms. Such mechanisms inflict battle-damage to the aircraft structure
and systems. This experimental investigation considered the aerodynamic consequences of
simulated battle-damage to a two-dimensional wing. Key assumptions and techniques were
identified leading to the modelling of both gunfire and missile fragmentation damage. Wind
tunnel balance measurements were undertaken, together with surface pressure measurements
and flow-visualisation methods. Force and moment results indicated extensive changes in
coefficient values, whilst both smoke and surface visualisation paint successfully indicated
the flow mechanisms present. Using these techniques the influences of damage and
experimental variables were investigated, including damage type, size, location and Reynolds
Number. Studies were also made into cases of multiple gunfire holes and the influence of
internal wing construction. Results indicated that damage at quarter and half-chord locations gave greater coefficient
changes than those seen for either leading or trailing edge damage. This was primarily due to
reductions in the upper surface pressure peak due to through-flow. Such reductions were seen
to extend in both a chordwise and spanwise direction. The flow mechanism identified
indicated both similarities and differences to those of flat-plate jets in crossflows. Analysis of
both gunfire and missile damage data lead to the development of a set of empirical
relationships, which related damage location and size to coefficient changes.
History
School
Aeronautical, Automotive, Chemical and Materials Engineering