posted on 2010-12-06, 10:55authored byRobert C.T. Ellis
The conventional view of project management is challenged by a contemporary
construction industry that is rethinking its processes and procedures as it seeks to align
itself with clients' business needs. Project managers must update their skills. They
require flexible education and training that complements work place experience rather
than distracts from professional obligations. Educational technology offers an exciting
opportunity to accommodate these, often conflicting, requirements. Computer-aided
learning (CAL) is supported by a government keen to promote a Learning Society, the
expansion of Higher Education (HE) postgraduate provision and the construction
industry's own initiatives to engender a culture of lifelong learning. Enthusiasts argue
that CAL provides greater access, enhances quality and overcomes the inherent
disadvantages of distance learning. Yet the apparent eagerness to develop innovative
CAL applications is not evidenced in an educational survey of built environment
postgraduate course provision. On the contrary, only small pockets of CAL activity
are available.
A new distance learning project management educational software application
(DIMEPM) is developed and compared with a traditional multiple media resource and
a well-established postgraduate module delivered in part-time mode. The design of
DIMEPM draws on the expertise of experienced practitioners in HE and the views of
leading academics in the field. Qualitative and quantitative approaches are employed
in a longitudinal evaluation that assesses the relative learning gains, student attitude
and confidence of HE students. And, in order to gain reaction from industry, DIMEPM
is subjected to an illuminative evaluation within a leading engineering and project
management consultancy.
The research study finds no significant difference in the academic performance of
students in the control and experimental groups. However, it is clear that technically
orientated tasks lend themselves more readily to CAL than interpersonal skills.
Distributed educational packages provide opportunities for enhancing distance
learning but alternative pedagogic approaches are needed to encourage web-based
dialogue and promote vicarious learning. Practitioners suggest that the distinction
between these alternative delivery methods is artificial and that an integrated approach
should be explored. Crucially, the research identifies considerable advantage in
linking outcomes to delivery mechanisms and advocates the use of an "Associated
Delivery" model.