posted on 2014-02-27, 14:22authored byAndrew Adams
This research project is an examination of the role of voluntary sports clubs (VSCs),
within a modernised political and policy process, in creating and sustaining forms of
social capital. From 1997 onwards, consecutive New Labour administrations concerned
with social inclusion and civic renewal have established a pivotal position for social
capital in many areas of social policy. In this context increasing political expectations
and policy demands are being made of VS Cs to contribute to this broader social
regeneration agenda. Social capital is a contested term between the democratic, rational
and critical strains of the concept, not least because each of which has its own conceptual
framework. In order to tease out the distinct differences between the competing strains of
social capital, and inform on its potential formation or destruction in VSCs, the concept
of the political opportunity structure (POS) has been employed as an analytical tool.
A qualitative case-study research method, within a critical realist methodology, was
chosen for primary data collection. This was based on a two-phase approach to capture
the perceptions of both VSC members and external stakeholders in relation to the
meaning, value and output of VSCs. Based on semi-structured qualitative interviews:
thirty-one for phase one and twenty-six for phase two, three case studies were generated.
This study shows that social capital is a powerful comparative and reflexive concept that
can facilitate a critical picture of how social relations operate at the micro level of the
VSC, and how these inform on a range of other social processes and conditions. New
Labour's modernisation programme was clearly indicated as a key structural process that
highlights the importance of structure and top-down processes in developing social
capital in VSCs at grass roots level. This research project shows how implicit tensions
between modemisation and mutual aid, when embedded in a voluntary based
organisation and serviced by a simplistic interpretation of social capital, tend to lead to
policy misdirection at best and at worst the entrenching of contradictory processes that
may destroy the very edifice that is targeted by much social policy.