posted on 2012-11-07, 16:37authored byCarina Gerlach
For the European Union (EU), the field of trade policy is a main field in which the EU
can assert its actorness and build its identity as an international actor. This
"superpower" potential arises out of the EU's extensive resource equipment in trade
policy and is driven forward by the EU's significant economic interests. To what
extent, however, the EU has been able to use its resources to shape the rules of the
international trade regime according to its own preferences has remained
questionable.
This thesis investigates the question of the EU's impact on and power utilisation in
the international trade regime by analysing the EU's changing involvement in World
Trade Organisation (WTO) negotiations. Drawing from the theoretical concepts of the
"international regime" and "power", the thesis proposes an approach centred on the
possession, mobilisation and impact of actors' power in international regimes. In
particular, the thesis proposes a framework centred on five key elements:
specification of the regime, its qualities and focus; the resources or 'underlying
power' that actors bring to the regime; the resources derived by actors from the
operation of the regime itself, or 'organisationally dependent capabilities'; the
manifestation or deployment of resources and strategies by actors in negotiations;
and outcomes defined in terms of actors' power over the regime itself. After an
examination of the broad context of the WTO's development and the EU's
involvement in the international trade regime, this framework is then explored through
a detailed study of the EU's involvement in the negotiations over trade in services
that took place in the WTO between 1995 and 2005, using evidence from a wide
range of documentary sources and from interviews.
On the basis of this exploration of trade in services, the thesis finds that despite the
EU's outstanding resources, the WTO negotiations have become too complex for the
EU to decisively influence them due to a power shift in the international trade regime.
The special nature of the trade in services negotiations makes these particularly unmanageable
and they do not seem to present the EU with a setting for achieving its
preferences. A lack of cooperation among the WTO members in favour of the negotiations
has made progress in the negotiations very hard to realise for the EU. At the
same time, the erosion of the EU's resources by the shifting attitude in civil society
towards trade policy, and an apparent Jack of business support, has increased the
challenge for the EU of managing the international trade regime. Questions are
therefore raised about the extent to which the EU has responded to change,
mobilised its resources effectively and had a consistent impact on the international
trade regime since the mid-1990s.