posted on 2010-11-02, 13:58authored byRobert Arthur Boydell
Although the International Drinking Water Supply and
Sanitation Decade has generated great interest from foreign
aid donors, its impact. in terms of increased service levels
has been poor. These disappointing results have been
explained by the UN and other donors in terms of inadequate
funding and lack of cost recovery, poor operations and
maintenance, lack of personnel, unacceptable technology,
poor logistics and non involvement of the beneficiaries.
However, an alternative explanation revolves around factors
contributing to poor project design. These include the lack
of understanding of the development process, donor bias and
self interest, and poor coordination and commitment by the
recipient government. A review of the development and
trends of contemporary aid philosophy and its translation
in to rural development and water and sanitation projects,
which led to the launch of the IDWSSD, provides a number of
lessons that can be used to formulate a hybrid model for
project design and the sector development process, that
defines the relative roles of donors, recipient governments
and people themselves. The model is based on coordinated
development, community participation, and sector growth
from pilot projects to large scale programmes.
The developments in the rural water and sanitation
sector that took place in Zimbabwe from 1974 to 1987,
provide a unique opportunity to test this model using a
systems analysis approach. After gaining Independence in
1980, Zimbabwe's development assistance funding grew
tenfold with the influx of foreign donors, and major
commitments were made by the new Government to rural
development and the goals of the IDWSSD. However, the large
investments in water and sanitation which included the
preparation of a national master plan with external
technical assistance, had both positive and negative
impacts on the continuing development of the sector, the
start of which can be traced back, well before
Independence, to small pilot projects sponsored by non
government organizations that used appropriate technology
developed by the Rhodesian Government. This development
process and the changing approach to project design is
illustrated by a series of case studies of projects
supported by multilateral and bilateral donors, and non
government organizations, that were milestones during this
period.
Finally the project and sector development model is
modified based on the practical lessons from Zimbabwe and
recommendations for future practice are made together with
suggestions for areas of further research.