posted on 2014-09-03, 09:12authored byHilary McDermott
This thesis is concerned with occupier behaviour within new homes and how
behaviour can interact with design features to lead to an increased risk of
injury or ill-health. Unintentional home injuries are a significant problem
within the UK and reducing the incidence and severity of such injuries is a
public health priority. Preventative measures targeting risk factors for
unintentional injury in the home have tended to focus on either primary
efforts to reduce hazards within the environment or behaviour change
strategies. It is important however, to also recognise the potential
contribution of the interactions that arise between dwelling design and
occupier behaviour and how these may influence safety and well-being.
This research comprised four studies, adopting a multi-methodological
approach. The first three studies used triangulated investigations to
examine occupier experiences of inhabiting a new home. The final study
offered an exploration of the attitudes of professionals responsible for the
design of new dwellings in relation to occupier safety and the factors which
shape current dwelling design.
In the initial stage of the research 40 in-depth, semi-structured interviews
and home inspections were conducted with new build occupiers. A range of
unsafe interactions were reported in relation to building features including
self-closing fire doors, loft access and service pipes and cabling. A number
of features were also identified which occupiers felt presented a risk to their
health and safety. These features included fire egress windows, sloped
access thresholds and descending newel posts, for example.
To assess how home interactions develop over time a diary-based study
was undertaken, allowing a temporal assessment of occupier behaviour. In
total, 9 usable diaries were completed by participants over durations varying
from 9 days to 211 days. Similar unsafe interactions were reported during
the course of this diary study and a range of features were reported as
presenting a risk of unintentional injury or ill-health. These features included high hot water temperatures, sloped internal ceilings and loft access. A
temporal analysis of interactions identified that occupiers are initially
proactive in seeking solutions to problems within their homes but these
attempts are not always successful.
The information gathered during these first two studies was used to design a
questionnaire which was distributed to 794 new homes in the Midlands area.
The aim of this questionnaire was to establish the prevalence of the
reported interactions amongst a wider population. Quantitative data from
this study suggested that many of the unsafe interactions reported during
the previous studies are commonplace in new homes.
The final study examined the attitudes of professionals responsible for the
design of new dwellings in relation to occupier safety and sought to identify
the factors which shape current dwelling design. Semi-structured interviews
were undertaken with 14 architects and designers. This study revealed that
some of those responsible for dwelling design have an unsympathetic
attitude towards occupier safety and well-being and rely almost entirely on
building regulations to ensure a level of health and safety within the home.
The design professional participants described a number of factors which
influence current dwelling design, sometimes these being at variance with
each other, for example developer needs can sometimes conflict with Local
Authority planning requirements.
The research has established that many of the interactions that arise within
the domestic setting are influenced by environmental, behavioural and
social factors. The thesis argues that prevention strategies adopting an
ecological systems approach to injury prevention present an opportunity to
address the complex set of factors affecting safety in the home.
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publication date
2007
Notes
A Doctoral Thesis. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University.