posted on 2011-01-10, 12:06authored byNatalie Fenton
The relationship between the media and social/political mobilisation is a specifically
modem phenomenon, contemporaneous with and responding to dominant capitalist
communications. Today the trend towards concentration marches forth, policies of
privatisation and deregulation of the media reveal a world-wide trend towards the
commodification of information, culture and hence, of democracy. We are witnessing
the privatisation of access to information and culture with the shrinking of public
space in communications. My research begins from the standpoint that we can not
ignore that we still live in deeply unequal capitalist societies, driven by profit and
competition operating on a global scale. It is also undeniable that we live in a media
dominated world with many different ideas and identities in circulation at any one
time. We need to understand the former to appreciate the latter - the relation between
individual autonomy, freedom and rational action on the one hand and the social
construction of identity and behaviour on the other. The mainstream media as part of
the political and economic infrastructure of society both disguise inequalities and
frustrate any attempts to contest or reveal them. As a consequence dissident or
oppressed groups have had to seek alternative means to be heard and to mobilise.
These means include both organisation (investigated here in the form of the voluntary
sector) and communication (including mainstream and 'alternative' media) within
civil society. My research investigates why it is felt there is an ever pressing need to
present oppositional views, how strategies of organisation and communication have
been deployed and with what success. This research examines the relationship
between the media and resistance - either as a dominant social force which through
uniformity of representation encourages digression, or as a means of forging other
identities and developing alternative political projects.