posted on 2013-07-01, 13:12authored bySerhat Erpolat
Adhesive bonding is the most attractive joining technique for many aerospace
applications. One of the most important reasons for this is the superior fatigue
performance of bonded joints compared to traditional joining techniques, fatigue being
considered as one of the most important design concerns for aerospace structures.
Previously, efforts have been made to develop lifetime prediction methods for bonded
joints under constant amplitude (CA) fatigue. Although CA fatigue conditions can be
assumed for some real structures, a more complex load history is likely to be expected
for many aerospace applications. However, a problem arises from the fact that materials
can behave very differently under variable amplitude (V A) loading than they do under
CA conditions. Cycles with different stress levels can interact and thus lead to
acceleration or retardation of the fatigue process. Despite this, there is very little work
on the V A fatigue of bonded joints. Therefore, in this work, the effect that V A fatigue
has on the initiation and propagation of damage in bonded composite joints was studied
and a predictive methodology for joints SUbjected to complex loading regimes was
developed.
In this study, both double lap joints (DLJ) and double-cantilever beam (DCB)
specimens were tested. The applicability of the Palmgren-Miner (P-M) rules and
numerical crack growth integration (NCGI) to bonded joints subject to a block-loading
V A spectrum were investigated. The P-M rules failed to predict the fatigue life of double lap joints and NCGI failed to predict both the experimentally observed cohesive
and interlaminar crack growth in bonded composite joints under V A loading. In all
cases, severe fatigue crack growth acceleration was reported. This is obviously of some
concern as traditional predictive methods will tend to overestimate the actual fatigue life
of bonded components. In order to improve the ability to predict V A fatigue in bonded
joints two novel useful predictive methodologies were developed: the 'Linear Cycle
Mix' (LCM) model for uncracked joints and the 'Damage Shift' model for double
cantilever beam (DCB) joints. The LCM method is based on the observation that the
mean stress variations, i.e. transitions from a CA stage to another stage having a higher
mean stress value, can be responsible for fatigue crack growth accelerations (i.e. the
'cycle mix' effect). This method proved to be a considerable improvement on traditional
cumulative damage laws. The Damage Shift model requires the modification of NCGI
to incorporate the effect of the damage zone induced by the overloads. This study
showed that the method can be used to explain unusual sudden crack jumps during the
initial stages of V A cycling and fatigue crack growth acceleration due to overloads. It is
suggested that the Damage Shift model may be applicable to a variety of complex
fatigue spectra.
History
School
Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering