Loughborough University
Browse

Animal sovereignty theory

chapter
posted on 2022-06-08, 12:14 authored by Josh MilburnJosh Milburn

Animals “are not brethren, they are not underlings, they are other Nations, caught with ourselves in the net of life and time, fellow prisoners of the splendour and travail of the earth.” So writes Henry Beston in his 1928 book The Outermost House (2003, 25). The idea was one echoed in the defining works of twentieth-century animal ethics, which tended to defend the idea that, when it came to wild animals, we should simply “[let] them be” (Regan 2004, 357). In one sense, animal sovereignty theory – the claim that wild animals should be conceived of as sovereign communities, entitled to be recognized as the sovereign controllers of their own spaces – offers a theoretical grounding of this view.  

History

School

  • Social Sciences and Humanities

Department

  • International Relations, Politics and History

Published in

Global Encyclopedia of Territorial Rights

Publisher

Springer Nature

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Rights holder

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG

Publisher statement

This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68846-6_71-1

Acceptance date

2019-11-18

Publication date

2020-03-27

Copyright date

2020

ISBN

9783319688466

Language

  • en

Editor(s)

Michael Kocsis; Nick C. Sagos

Depositor

Dr Josh Milburn. Deposit date: 28 March 2022

Usage metrics

    Loughborough Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC