This paper contrast the rationales behind semantic and syntactic approaches to
teaching an undergraduate transition-to-proof course, using data from
interviews with two mathematicians. It addresses the ICMI theme of teachers’
views and beliefs, with particular focus on (1) instructors’ expectations in proofbased
courses and (2) both example-based and logical structure-based skills
that we would like students to develop before arriving at university.
History
School
Science
Department
Mathematics Education Centre
Citation
ALCOCK, L., 2009. Teaching proof to undergraduates: semantic and syntactic approaches. IN: Lin, F., Hanna, F.H.G. and de Villiers, M. (eds). Proceedings of the ICMI Study 19 conference: Proof and Proving, 10-15 May 2009, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei. ICMI, volume 1, pp. 29-34.
This is a conference paper. The conference proceedings are available from: http://140.122.140.1/~icmi19/files/Volume_1.pdf and http://140.122.140.1/~icmi19/files/Volume_2.pdf