Loughborough University
Browse
1/1
3 files

Supplementary information files for COVID-19 lockdowns: a worldwide survey of circadian rhythms and sleep quality in 3911 athletes from 49 countries, with data-driven recommendations

dataset
posted on 2022-07-01, 09:15 authored by Mohamed Romdhani, Dale E Rae, Mathieu Nédélec, Achraf Ammar, Hamdi Chtourou, Ramzi Al Horani, Helmi Ben Saad, Nicola Bragazzi, Gürhan Dönmez, Tarak Driss, Hugh HK Fullagar, Abdulaziz Farooq, Sergio Garbarino, Omar Hammouda, Bahar Hassanmirzaei, Karim Khalladi, Syrine Khemila, Leonardo Jose Mataruna-Dos-Santos, Imen Moussa-Chamari, Iñigo Mujika, Hussein Muñoz Helú, Amin Norouzi Fashkhami, Laisa Liane Paineiras-Domingos, Mehrshad Rahbari Khaneghah, Yoshitomo Saita, Khaled Trabelsi, Jacopo Antonino Vitale, Jad Adrian Washif, Johanna Weber, Nizar Souissi, Lee TaylorLee Taylor, Karim Chamari

Supplementary files for article COVID-19 lockdowns: a worldwide survey of circadian rhythms and sleep quality in 3911 athletes from 49 countries, with data-driven recommendations.

Objective

In a convenience sample of athletes, we conducted a survey of COVID-19-mediated lockdown (termed ‘lockdown’ from this point forward) effects on: (i) circadian rhythms; (ii) sleep; (iii) eating; and (iv) training behaviors.

Methods

In total, 3911 athletes [mean age: 25.1 (range 18–61) years, 1764 female (45%), 2427 team-sport (63%) and 1442 elite (37%) athletes] from 49 countries completed a multilingual cross-sectional survey including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Insomnia Severity Index questionnaires, alongside bespoke questions about napping, training, and nutrition behaviors.

Results

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (4.3 ± 2.4 to 5.8 ± 3.1) and Insomnia Severity Index (4.8 ± 4.7 to 7.2 ± 6.4) scores increased from pre- to during lockdown (p < 0.001). Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index was predominantly influenced by sleep-onset latency (p < 0.001; + 29.8%), sleep efficiency (p < 0.001; − 21.1%), and total sleep time (p < 0.001; − 20.1%), whilst Insomnia Severity Index was affected by sleep-onset latency (p < 0.001; + 21.4%), bedtime (p < 0.001; + 9.4%), and eating after midnight (p < 0.001; + 9.1%). During lockdown, athletes reported fewer training sessions per week (− 29.1%; d = 0.99). Athletes went to bed (+ 75 min; 5.4%; d = 1.14) and woke up (+ 150 min; 34.5%; d = 1.71) later during lockdown with an increased total sleep time (+ 48 min; 10.6%; d = 0.83). Lockdown-mediated circadian disruption had more deleterious effects on the sleep quality of individual-sport athletes compared with team-sport athletes (p < 0.001; d = 0.41), elite compared with non-elite athletes (p = 0.028; d = 0.44) and older compared with younger (p = 0.008; d = 0.46) athletes.

Conclusions

These lockdown-induced behavioral changes reduced sleep quality and increased insomnia in athletes. Data-driven and evidence-based recommendations to counter these include, but are not limited to: (i) early outdoor training; (ii) regular meal scheduling (whilst avoiding meals prior to bedtime and caffeine in the evening) with appropriate composition; (iii) regular bedtimes and wake-up times; and (iv) avoidance of long and/or late naps.

History

School

  • Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences