posted on 2016-12-19, 09:57authored byPhilip Borg, Dave Hewitt, Ian JonesIan Jones
Upshot: We seek to address several questions and statements made in the commentaries by elaborating on the four main aspects of the M-N-L framework. Before doing so, we discuss the issue of constructivist teaching in the context of schools. We conclude by hypothesizing on what would be lost in the M-N-L framework by taking constructivism out of the picture.
History
School
Science
Department
Mathematics Education Centre
Published in
Constructivist Foundations
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
83 - 90 (8)
Citation
BORG, P., HEWITT, D.P.L. and JONES, I., 2016. Authors' Response: The M-N-L framework: Bringing radical constructivist theories to daily teaching practices. Constructivist Foundations, 12 (1), pp.83-90
Publisher
Alexander Riegler, Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Publisher statement
This work is made available according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence. Full details of this licence are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/