Substitution and sameness: two components of a relational conception of the equals sign
journal contributionposted on 27.06.2012 by Ian Jones, Matthew Inglis, Camilla K. Gilmore, Margaret Dowens
Any type of content formally published in an academic journal, usually following a peer-review process.
A sophisticated and flexible understanding of the equals sign is important for arithmetic competence and for learning further mathematics, particularly algebra. Research has identified two common conceptions held by children: the equals sign as an operator, and the equals sign as signalling the same value on both sides of the equation. We argue here that as well as these two conceptions, the notion of substitution is also an important part of a sophisticated understanding of mathematical equivalence. We provide evidence from a cross-cultural study in which English and Chinese children were asked to rate the “cleverness” of operational, sameness and substitutive definitions of the equals sign. A Principle Components Analysis revealed the substitutive items were distinct from the sameness items. Furthermore, Chinese children rated the substitutive items as ‘very clever’, whereas the English children rated them as ‘not so clever’, suggesting that the notion of substitution develops differently across the two countries. Implications for developmental models of children’s understanding of equivalence are discussed.
- Mathematics Education Centre